搜题集 >学历类 >外语类 >试题详情
问题详情

The truth about alliances and their merit probably lies somewhere between the travel utopia presented by the players and the evil empires portrayed by their critics.



A.collaboration B.worth C.triumph D.defect

未搜索到的试题可在搜索页快速提交,您可在会员中心"提交的题"快速查看答案。 收藏该题
查看答案

相关问题推荐

The students was just about to ( )the question, when suddenly he found answer



A.arrive at B.submit C.work out D.give up
s="" institutes="" in="" london="" and="" leicester="" as="" a="" surveyor's="" apprentice="" pupil="" teacher.

The fact is that there are two traditions of explanation that march side by side in the ascent of man. One is the analysis of the physical structure of the world. The other is the study of the processes of life; their delicacy, their diversity, the wavering cycles from life to death in the individual and in the species. And these traditions do not come together until the theory of evolution; because until then there is a paradox which cannot be resolved, which cannot be begun, about life.

'>

The theory of evolution by natural selection was put forward in the 1850s independently by two men. One was Charles Darwin; the other was Alfred Wallace, Both men had some scientific background, or course, but at heart both men were naturalist. Darwin had been a medical student at Edinburgh University for two years, before his father who was a wealthy doctor proposed that he might become a clergyman and sent him to Cambridge. Wallace whose parents were poor and who had left school at 14, and followed courses at Working Men's Institutes in London and Leicester as a surveyor's apprentice and pupil teacher.

The fact is that there are two traditions of explanation that march side by side in the ascent of man. One is the analysis of the physical structure of the world. The other is the study of the processes of life; their delicacy, their diversity, the wavering cycles from life to death in the individual and in the species. And these traditions do not come together until the theory of evolution; because until then there is a paradox which cannot be resolved, which cannot be begun, about life.

s="" necessities,="" increasing="" affluence="" matters="" (9)="" little.="" in="" the="" u.s.,="" canada,="" and="" europe,="" correlation="" between="" income="" happiness="" is,="" as="" university="" of="" michigan="" researcher="" noted="" a="" 1980s="" 16-nation="" study,="" “virtually="" (10)="" ”.="" is="" lower="" (11)="" very="" poor.="" but="" once="" comfortable,="" more="" money="" provides="" diminishing="" returns.Even very rich people are only slightly happier than average. With net worth all (12) $100 million, providing (13)money to buy things they don't need and hardly care about, 4 in 5 of the 49 people responding to survey agreed that “Money can increase or decrease happiness, depending on how it is used”. And some were indeed unhappy. One fabulously (14) man said he could never remember being happy. One woman reported that money (15) misery caused by her children's' problems.At the other end of life's circumstances are most victims of disabling tragedies. Yet, remarkably, most eventually recover a near-normal level of day-to-day happiness. Thus, university students who must cope with disabilities are (16)able-bodied students to report themselves happy, and their friends agree with their self-perceptions.We have (17) the American dream of achieved wealth and well-being by comparing rich and unrich countries, and rich and unrich people. That leaves the final question: Over time, does happiness rise with affluence?Typically not. Lottery winners appear to gain but a temporary jolt of joy from their winnings. On a small scale, a jump in our income can boost our morale, for a while. But in the long run, neither an ice cream cone nor a new car nor becoming rich and famous produces the same feelings of delight that it initially (18) . Happiness is not the result of being rich, but a (19) consequence of having recently become richer. Wealth, it therefore seems, is like health: Although its utter absence can breed misery, having it does not guarantee happiness. Happiness is (20) a matter of getting what we want than of wanting what we have.'>

During the mid-1980s, my family and I spent a(1)year in the historic town of St. Andrews, Scotland. Comparing life there with life in America, we were impressed by a (2) disconnection between national wealth and well-being. To most Americans, Scottish life would have seemed (3) . Incomes were about half that in the U.S. Among families in the Kingdom of Fife surrounding St. Andrews, 44 percent did not own a car, and we never met a family that owned two. Central heating in this place (4)south of Iceland was, at that time, still a luxury.In hundreds of conversations during our year there and during three half summer stays since, we (5) notice that, (6)their simpler living, the Scots appeared (7) joyful than Americans. We heard complaints about Margaret Thatcher, but never about being underpaid or unable to afford wants.Within any country, such as our own, are rich people happier? In poor countries, being relatively well off does make (8) somewhat better well off. But in affluent countries, where nearly everyone can afford life's necessities, increasing affluence matters (9) little. In the U.S., Canada, and Europe, the correlation between income and happiness is, as University of Michigan researcher noted in a 1980s 16-nation study, “virtually (10) ”. Happiness is lower (11) the very poor. But once comfortable, more money provides diminishing returns.Even very rich people are only slightly happier than average. With net worth all (12) $100 million, providing (13)money to buy things they don't need and hardly care about, 4 in 5 of the 49 people responding to survey agreed that “Money can increase or decrease happiness, depending on how it is used”. And some were indeed unhappy. One fabulously (14) man said he could never remember being happy. One woman reported that money (15) misery caused by her children's' problems.At the other end of life's circumstances are most victims of disabling tragedies. Yet, remarkably, most eventually recover a near-normal level of day-to-day

Translate the following sentences into good English.1.这些新设立的企业带动了上千万人就业,而且成长性强,是中国经济增长新的支撑力量。我们不仅降低市场准入门槛,采取“雪中送炭”的政策支持这些新设企业,还加强事中事后监管、创造公平竞争的市场环境,织密社会保障安全网、让创业创新者无后顾之忧,培植企业健康成长的沃土。2.中国是医疗卫生领域国际合作的倡导者、推动者和践行者,始终致力于实现国际人口与发展大会行动纲领,全面落实联合国2030年可持续发展议程特别是健康领域可持续发展目标,积极开展对外医疗援助和全球应急处置,认真履行健康领域国际公约,勇于承担国际人道主义责任。3.贫困的广泛存在严重妨碍人权的充分实现和享有。减缓和消除贫困,是人权保障的重要内容。多年来,中国政府坚持消除贫困、改善民生、逐步实现共同富裕,持续开展以农村扶贫开发为中心的减贫行动,努力实现脱贫致富。

m="" afra this="" painting="" is="" not="" by="" vincent="" van="" gogh.="" it's="" only="" a="" copy="" and="" so="" (="" ).'>

I'm afraid this painting is not by Vincent Van Gogh. It's only a copy and so it's ( ).



A.worthless B.invaluable C.unworthy D.priceless
联系客服 会员中心
TOP